How to Choose Two-Wheeler Insurance Based on Usage

0

A two wheeler insurance works best when it is chosen around your routine, not around a headline premium. A daily commuter faces different risks from a weekend rider, and a scooter used for short errands needs a different focus from a bike used on highways. This guide helps you match cover to usage without overbuying.

Start With What You Must Have: Third-Party Coverage

Third-party coverage is the legal minimum to ride on Indian roads. It protects you if your vehicle causes injury to someone or damages their property. It will not cover repairs to your own bike or scooter, so treat it as compliance and liability protection.

Pick the Cover Type Based on Your Riding Pattern

Your daily commute, parking conditions, and ride distances should decide whether you need only third-party coverage or a broader plan with own-damage protection.

Daily City Commuting

If you ride through traffic most days, a minor crash or a topple in a tight parking slot is not rare. Comprehensive bike insurance usually suits this profile because it includes third-party coverage and own-damage protection in one plan. Prefer insurers with network garages you can actually reach.

Occasional Rider or Second Vehicle

If the bike is used occasionally, some owners keep only third-party cover to meet the legal requirement. That can work if you are comfortable paying for your own repairs and you park in a safer, supervised space. If street parking is common, adding own-damage cover can be a smarter compromise than relying on third-party alone.

Frequent Highway Rides

Highways change the cost of a bad day. Towing support and faster access to authorised repairs matter more when help is far away. A comprehensive plan is generally the more comfortable choice for touring. Also, check the claim process, because a smoother claim settlement reduces downtime when you are away from home.

New Rider or Crowded Neighbourhood Riding

If you are still building confidence or ride in lanes with heavy two-wheeler traffic, prioritise protecting your own vehicle. Choose a plan with clear deductibles and realistic exclusions. Avoid buying add-ons you do not understand, because unclear terms create frustration at claim time.

Scooter Use for Errands and Family Rides

Scooter insurance is structured much like bike cover, but the usage is often stop-and-go with frequent short trips. Scratches, panel damage, and minor falls can be common. Consider a cover mix that protects the bodywork and electricals, and keep documents updated if the scooter is shared.

Choose Policy Add-Ons Only When They Match the Risk

Policy add-ons should address specific concerns related to monsoon, travel, or theft. Common add-ons riders consider include:

  • Roadside assistance and towing support for breakdowns or flooded roads.
  • Engine and key parts protection where waterlogging is common.
  • Consumables cover small items billed during repairs.
  • Accessories cover for fitted items you have paid for separately.

Do a Premium Comparison the Right Way

Online bike insurance makes comparing easier, but compare like-for-like. When you do a premium comparison, keep the cover type and add-ons the same, then evaluate:

  • Deductibles and what you pay out of pocket.
  • Exclusions that can block a claim.
  • Cashless repair availability and workshop convenience.
  • Claim reporting channels and document requirements.

A cheaper quote can be poor value if repairs are inconvenient or the claim process is hard to navigate.

Before You Buy Online

With online bike insurance, read the policy wording, not just the summary. Confirm whether the plan is comprehensive or only third-party. Check if an inspection is needed for vehicles. Save screenshots of add-ons and the breakup so there is no confusion during renewal or claim.

Keep Renewal Habits Orderly

Renew on time to avoid gaps, and update changes such as accessories, parking location, or ownership. If you remain claim-free, you may preserve renewal benefits linked to your claim history. Read the schedule before paying, because small errors are easier to fix early.

Final Thoughts

Choose two-wheeler insurance by starting with legal compliance, then adding own-damage protection according to how and where you ride. Use comprehensive bike insurance for regular traffic exposure or touring; rely on third-party-only coverage when risk is genuinely low; and treat policy add-ons as targeted tools.

SC Governor Sued in Supreme Court For Sending SC National Guard to DC on Policing Mission

A new lawsuit has just been filed in the South Carolina Supreme Court to block Gov. Henry McMaster from sending South Carolina National Guard troops to DC for policing missions tied to President Donald Trump’s 2025 “crime emergency” actions.

The suit was filed yesterday and is specifically asking the court for an order declaring the latest deployment unlawful and stopping future deployments under the same initiative.

Details

Who’s suing: The South Carolina Public Interest Foundation and James Weninger, a Navy veteran and Berkeley County resident.

Who’s named: Gov. Henry McMaster and Maj. Gen. Robin B. Stilwell, the adjutant general of the South Carolina National Guard.

What the lawsuit argues:

  • The complaint says McMaster has now twice deployed South Carolina Guard troops to Washington, D.C., and that the deployments exceed the governor’s authority under South Carolina law.

  • Plaintiffs point to state statutes that list limited circumstances for calling up and deploying the Guard (including war, invasion, insurrection/riot, imminent danger, or public disaster).

  • They also cite the state constitution’s requirement that military power remain subordinate to civil authority.

What they want the court to do:

  • Declare the Nov. 26, 2025 deployment unlawful.

  • Permanently block the state from carrying out that deployment and bar future deployments tied to Trump’s D.C. executive order and memo.

Why this is moving fast: The plaintiffs filed directly in the South Carolina Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction under Rule 245, instead of starting in a lower court.

Brief take on the chances of success

This case has a plausible legal theory but faces real procedural and precedent headwinds.

  • Big first hurdle: The South Carolina Supreme Court may decline to take the case immediately if it believes a lower court can handle it first. Rule 245 says the court generally won’t take original jurisdiction unless public interest, emergency, or other strong reasons justify it.

  • On the merits: The lawsuit leans on the plain language of South Carolina’s Guard-deployment statutes and argues Washington, D.C., does not meet those triggers.

  • What similar litigation suggests: A West Virginia state-court challenge to that state’s D.C. Guard deployment was dismissed after a judge found the governor acted within state authority, underscoring how uphill these cases can be.

Bottom line: If the South Carolina Supreme Court accepts the case, plaintiffs have a clearer shot at a legal ruling on statutory limits. But winning quickly—and winning outright—is far from guaranteed given how courts often treat Guard deployments and executive discretion.

Background Information

What triggered the deployments: The complaint describes an Aug. 11, 2025 Trump executive order declaring a crime emergency in Washington, D.C., plus a same-day memo directing the Defense Department to coordinate with governors for additional Guard forces under Title 32 (not a full federal “Title 10” activation).

South Carolina’s first deployment: McMaster announced Aug. 16, 2025 he was sending 200 South Carolina Guardsmen to support federal law enforcement activities, funded under Title 32 and subject to recall for hurricanes or natural disasters.

The second deployment: The complaint says McMaster announced a second deployment on Nov. 26, 2025.

West Virginia’s lawsuit (the closest state-court parallel): In West Virginia, a civic group sued Gov. Patrick Morrisey over that state’s D.C. deployment. A judge allowed the deployment to continue and dismissed the case without prejudice.

Other recent lawsuits in state courts: The West Virginia case and this new South Carolina case are the two prominent state-court challenges that surfaced in reporting and court filings I could verify. Most of the broader legal fight over the D.C. deployments has played out in federal court, including D.C.’s lawsuit against the Trump administration.

Local impact for Charlotte readers

Charlotte sits at the center of a two-state metro, and this lawsuit matters because it tests how far a governor can go when federal officials request Guard help outside state lines. If South Carolina’s Supreme Court tightens the rules, it could reduce future out-of-state deployments—and keep more Guard capacity closer to home during hurricane season and other regional emergencies.

Charlotte’s 10 Worst Restaurant Health Scores in December 2025

0

Mecklenburg County health inspectors gave these 10 restaurants the lowest reported scores in December 2025.

Every spot on this list earned a B, but several landed closer to a C, driven by repeat concerns like temperature control, handwashing, and sanitation.


Details


#10 — Hyatt House Charlotte Rea Farms (88.50, B)

Address: 9930 Sandy Rock Pl, Charlotte, NC 28277
Inspection date: Dec. 11, 2025

Observed violations (per the report):

  • “Observed several repeat violations and PIC not able to answer inspectors questions…”

  • “Observed no disposable towels at handwashing sink near dish…”

  • “Observed no detergent left at dish machine.”

  • “Observed plate and several ramikins stored as clean but soiled.”

  • “Observed cheddar cheese cold held at 53 degrees F.”

  • “Observed cut romaine lettuce not date marked over 24 hours and deli meat not date marked…”

  • “Observed TPHC not being followed.”

  • “Observed a plate stored on box of cleaning agent.”

  • “Observed open bag of sugar on ground.”

  • “Observed apples for consumer grab and go uncovered / unprotected.”

  • “Observed some coffee filters uncovered / unprotected.”

  • “Observed box of single-service articles on ground in kitchen.”

  • “Observed trash can upside down and not available.” public.cdpehs.com+1


#9 — Pine Island Country Club Main Kitchen (88.50, B)

Address: 1701 Stoneyridge Dr, Charlotte, NC 28214
Inspection date: Dec. 19, 2025

Observed violations (per the report):

  • “Observed overall lack of control throughout the kitchen…”

  • “Observed employee work with dirty dishes… then handle clean dishes without a handwash.”

  • “Observed bar handsink with no handwash sign, no hand soap, no paper towels, and being used as a dump sink.”

  • “Observed employee get water from the handsink and fill a container.”

  • “Observed dented can of corn on the seam in dry storage area.”

  • “Observed 0ppm chlorine at dish machine.”

  • “Observed no detergent at dish machine.”

  • “Observed shredded/cut cabbage cooling in prep top…”

  • “Observed some items… with no date mark including… cooked mushrooms, bacon jam, and sweet potatoes.”

  • “Observed several items held past 7 days including… pico (12/9), fruit salad (12/10), hotdogs (12/2)…”

  • “Observed no asterisk for salmon tacos on lunch menu.”

  • “Observed cabbage cooling in prep top cooler in a deep pan.”

  • “*Observed – Reduced oxygen packaged salmon and mahi mahi fully thawed…”

  • “Observed squeeze bottles of cooking oil and water… not labeled…”

  • “Observed box of panko stored on the floor…”

  • “Boxes of single service items stored on floor in dry storage room.”

  • “Observed gaskets… damaged… shelving… rusted… floor in walk in cooler… damaged.”

  • “Observed no test strips for 3-comp sink…”

  • “Observed missing drain plug in dumpster… Observed some items built up in dumpster area.”

  • “Observed ceiling, AC vents, and walls… with various build up and dust.”

  • “Observed employee cell phones stored on prep surfaces…” public.cdpehs.com


#8 — Greco Fresh Grille Colony (88.50, B)

Address: 7731 Colony Rd, Charlotte, NC 28226
Inspection date: Dec. 29, 2025

Observed violations (per the report):

  • “Observed various P and Pf violations during inspection.”

  • “Observed no Certified Food Protection Manager on site…”

  • “Observed no handwashing signs at either handsink…”

  • “Observed cooked chicken cooling since 10:30am holding at 74F by 1:55pm.”

  • “Observed soup being held outside of temperature control… at 121F…”

  • “Observed spanakopita… at 53F…”

  • “Observed feta cheese and cooked pasta… opening/preparation dates of 12/22. Observed mozzarella… with no date label.”

  • “Observed blanched french fries being held on time with no label…”

  • “Observed cooked chicken cooling while in covered and stacked plastic containers…”

  • “Observed container of oregano… not baring label…”

  • “Observed heavily soiled pieces of styrofoam in RIF…”

  • “Observed very heavy food debris and dust build up on shelving…”

  • “Observed a multitude of employee belongings being stored above and in conjunction with customer foods…” public.cdpehs.com+1


#7 — Tupelo Honey Cafe (87.50, B)

Address: 101 S Tryon St, Suite 130, Charlotte, NC 28202
Inspection date: Dec. 9, 2025

Observed violations (per the report):

  • “Observed pistol grip hose sprayer connected to a hose at the mop sink.”

  • “Observed employee pick up item off the ground… then immediately donned new gloves.”

  • “Observed employee obtain water from the handsink and fill up the steam table.”

  • “Observed no paper towels at the handsink behind the bar.”

  • “Observed unwashed produce stored over ready to eat items…”

  • “Observed sticker residue and pieces of stickers remaining on pans…”

  • “Observed chorizo sausage cooked to 137F and set on rack to cool.”

  • “Observed cooler drawers… holding items above 41F.”

  • “Observed… chicken salad… made with chicken from 12/5…”

  • “Observed goat cheese without date marking…”

  • “Observed no date marking on tub of goat cheese…”

  • “Observed one squeeze bottle of water with no label.”

  • “Observed tongs stored hanging at side of grill…”

  • “Observed a few dishes wet stacked…”

  • “Observed handsinks… need of re-caulking.”

  • “Observed torn gaskets…”

  • “Observed missing bell cap at mop sink back flow preventer.”

  • “Observed cleaning needed to equipment throughout…”

  • “Observed no lid for trashcan in restroom.”

  • “Observed vents… with significant dust build up.”

  • “Observed flooring significantly damaged…” public.cdpehs.com


#6 — Mezeh Mediterranean Grill (Strawberry Hill) (87.00, B)

Address: 4920 Old Sardis Rd, Ste D3, Charlotte, NC 28211
Inspection date: Dec. 17, 2025

Observed violations (per the report):

  • “Observed key holder… unable to answer most EHS questions…”

  • “Observed no Certified Food Protection Manager on site…”

  • “Observed sanitizer at dish machine dispensing at 0ppm chlorine…”

  • “Observed various utensils… stored as clean while caked with food or sticker residue.”

  • “Observed bulgur wheat… below 135F…”

  • “Observed no foods held on TPHC properly labeled…”

  • “Observed container of hand soap… stored… above customer foods…”

  • “Observed multiple squeeze bottles… not baring label…”

  • “Observed unwashed avocados still baring produce sticker…”

  • “Observed… hotel pans stacked together while wet…”

  • “Observed conveyor oven in total disrepair…”

  • “Observed three out of five burners on flattop unit broken…”

  • “Observed no chlorine test strips…”

  • “Observed food debris crusted on clean utensil shelving…”

  • “Observed no trash receptacle… at back handsink…”

  • “Observed missing wall tile behind panini press…”

  • “Observed food debris littered on floor in dish pit area.”

  • “Observed multiple employee bags, coats, and phones… above customer foods…” public.cdpehs.com+2public.cdpehs.com+2


#5 — Mocco Bistro (86.50, B)

Address: 4004 South Blvd, Suite E, Charlotte, NC 28209
Inspection date: Dec. 3, 2025

Observed violations (per the report):

  • “Observed no CFPM present during inspection.”

  • “Observed that facility does not have an employe health policy in place.”

  • “Observed food employee wash hands for less than 20 seconds.”

  • “Observed food employee handle raw shelled eggs and then don new gloves without washing hands.”

  • “Observed food employee wash hands at 3-comp sink.”

  • “Observed food employee use handsink… to dump drinks.”

  • “Observed no handwashing sign…”

  • “Observed raw shelled eggs eggs on the counter.”

  • “Observed shredded lettuce… oat milk, whole milk and half/half with no date mark.”

  • “Observed sanitizer in 3 compartment sink at over 200ppm for chlorine.”

  • “Observed wiping cloth… stored in sanitizer solution over 200ppm.”

  • “Observed scoops with no handle stored in dry goods”

  • “Observed facility utilizing unapproved wooden bowls.”

  • “Observed hot water… reached a peak temperature of 91F…”

  • “Observed that the dumpster did not have a lid.”

  • “Observed flooring not smooth and easily cleanable.”

  • “Observed large mixer and other items no longer in use.” public.cdpehs.com


#4 — Pho Nam Vietnamese Cuisine (85.50, B)

Address: 18059 West Catawba Ave, Cornelius, NC 28031
Inspection date: Dec. 22, 2025

Observed violations (per the report):

  • “Observed PIC not effectively monitoring handwashing practices…”

  • “Observed no CFPM onsite during inspection.”

  • “Observed food employee fail to wash hands…”

  • “Observed food employee and PIC fail to properly wash hands before donning gloves…”

  • “Observed no paper towels at front handsink.”

  • “Observed dishes stored in front handsink… pitchers being filled… heavy food residue accumulation…”

  • “Observed deli slice stored as clean with food reside…”

  • “Observed food thermometer stored as clean… with food residue…”

  • “Observed pork… chicken soup… temping below 135F.”

  • “Observed TCS foods not listed on TPHC procedures… being held on time.”

  • “Observed fried tofu, cooked cabbage, pork, and noodles being held on time without time stamp.”

  • “Observed spray bottles… without labeling.”

  • “Observed cooked shrimp and cooked chicken cooling… in tightly wrapped packaging.”

  • “Observed several containers of seasoning… without labeling.”

  • “Observed multiple flying insects in kitchen and prep areas.”

  • “Observed shelving… with heavy residue accumulation…”

  • “Observed walls… near dish machine with residue accumulation… under and behind equipment with food debris…” public.cdpehs.com


#3 — Bojangles’ (84.50, B)

Address: 11137 E Independence Blvd, Matthews, NC 28105
Inspection date: Dec. 15, 2025

Observed violations (per the report):

  • “Observed employee wash hands for less than 20 seocnds.”

  • “Observed build up both in and out of cleaned dishes.”

  • “Observed harsh browns, sausage gravy… below 135F.”

  • “Observed ranch sauce, lettuce in the WI without dates.”

  • “Observed basket of fries being held on TPHC without start/discard label.”

  • “Observed facility without a working thin probe thermometer.”

  • “Observed flour stored… with water leaks on it.”

  • “Observed no presence of sanitizer buckets and multiple soiled and damp wiping cloths…”

  • “Observed wet stacking of cleaned dishes.”

  • “Observed single use items stored directly on the floor.”

  • “Also observed single use items stored with splashes and build up on them.”

  • “Observed broken shelves in the WI.”

  • “Observed large amounts of food debris in the RI freezer.”

  • “Also observed build on all equipments… including the ice machine cover.”

  • “Observed waste stored directly on the floor…”

  • “Observed opened dumpsters outside.”

  • “Observed food debris on the floors throughout the kitchen…”

  • “Also observed build up on vents.” public.cdpehs.com


#2 — Kosei Teki Sushi (82.5, B)

Address: 10110 Johnston Rd, Suite 110, Charlotte, NC 28210
Inspection date: Dec. 18, 2025

Observed violations (per the report):

  • “Observed raw salmon stored over salad mix in 2D cooler.”

  • “Observed tuna tacos holding in rice cooker at 81F.”

  • “Observed tuna tacos cold holding at 55F.”

  • “Observed thermometer stored as clean on 2D reach-in cooler with food residue accumulation.”

  • “Observed numerous containers of food in the walk in cooler and reach in units without labels…”

  • “Observed utensils stored in still water at 111F.”

  • “Observed facility utilizing unapproved raw wood shelves…”

  • “Observed buildup on rice cooker, sides of equipment, shelving throughout and gaskets…”

  • “Observed dumpster open at time of inspection.”

  • “Observed floor in dish machine area is not in good repair, grease and food debris under equipment and a floor grout missing.” public.cdpehs.com+1


#1 — Cafe Brundavan (81.50, B)

Address: 3130 Driwood Ct, Unit A, Charlotte, NC 28269
Inspection date: Dec. 18, 2025

Observed violations (per the report):

  • “Observed the handsink blocked by a chef jacket…”

  • “Observed no Certified Food Protection Manager on site…”

  • “Observed chicken in walk in refrigerator at 54F.”

  • “Observed chicken in the 2D cooler at 59F.”

  • “Observed egg curry at 56F.”

  • “Observed raw eggs stored in unapproved containers holding at 61F.”

  • “Observed 0 ppm chlorine at dish machine.”

  • “Observed no detergent at dish machine.”

  • “Observed greasy film on clean plates stored above the dish machine.”

  • “Observed a glass being cleaned by wiping with a cloth…”

  • “Observed food handler with glove on putting hand in pants…”

  • “Observed idli… being held on TPHC…” (without supporting procedure)

  • “Observed a potato dish… with no date…”

  • “Observed a spray bottle of peroxide stored on the ledge of the flip top unit.”

  • “Observed food items… did not cool in the required time frame…”

  • “Observed the reach in unit near the grill with no ambient thermometer.”

  • “Observed several dry goods and sauces with no food labels.”

  • “Observed multiple containers of food on the floor…”

  • “Observed dry goods… with open bags.”

  • “Observed a damp wiping cloth… not stored in sanitizer.”

  • “Observed a container of hot water… at 123 F… with food residue…”

  • “Observed wet stacked clean pans…”

  • “Observed rice cake steamers… seams are cracked…”

  • “Observed a batter machine with stone wheels that are not smooth.”

  • “Observed non-food contact surfaces throughout the kitchen in need of cleaning.”

  • “Observed a pressurized hose… with no backflow prevention.”

  • “Observed floors and walls throughout in need of cleaning.”

  • “Observed lights with no shields.” public.cdpehs.com+1

If you’d like to monitor health scores or do a quick search for a restaurant you’re about to eat at, check out North Carolina’s health inspection database here.

SCDCA Confirms Major Data Breach – 108,829 South Carolina Residents Info Leaked

0

Over 108,000 South Carolina residents had their personal information exposed in a data breach involving 700Credit, a company used by dealerships nationwide to process auto financing, according to the S.C. Department of Consumer Affairs.

The company discovered suspicious activity in its web application on October 25, 2025, and an investigation later confirmed that unauthorized actors copied records containing names, addresses, dates of birth, and Social Security numbers. So far, 700Credit says there is no evidence the stolen data has been misused, but the severity of the breach prompted immediate notification to state officials.

700Credit is offering affected residents free credit monitoring through Cyberscout, and encourages people to watch their accounts and check their credit reports for unusual activity. Impacted South Carolinians will receive enrollment instructions directly from the company.

The company is urging anyone with additional questions to call 833-586-1820, Monday through Friday, from 8 am – 6pm Eastern.

Charlotte Rents Fell 1.1% – December 2025 Rent Report

0

Charlotte’s rental market continued to cool in December, with median prices dropping again and marking the city’s second straight year of declining rents.

New data from Apartment List shows Charlotte’s overall median rent fell 1.1% last month to $1,366 and is now down 2.5% year-over-year — a sharper decline than both the state average (–1.9%) and national average (–1.3%).

One-bedroom units now average $1,242, while two-bedroom units average $1,354. Charlotte ranks as the 53rd most expensive large city in the U.S., placing it slightly above the national median. The city’s monthly decline also placed it near the bottom of the nation’s 100 largest markets for December.

Across the metro area, the median rent sits at $1,303, making Charlotte proper 4.8% more expensive than its surrounding suburbs. Rent trends vary widely: Gastonia saw the region’s fastest growth at 3.1%, while Huntersville remains the most expensive at $1,673. Kannapolis is the most affordable at $1,170.

After years of rapid increases — including a 19% surge in 2021 — Charlotte’s rental prices have now flattened or declined for three consecutive years. Analysts say the cooling trend is likely tied to rising inventory and stabilizing demand, with more new units coming online across the city in 2026.

New USC Report Concludes Fort Mill’s Silfab Factory Could Pose “Life-Threatening” Risk To School Children

0

A new University of South Carolina (USC) health study is now raising alarms about potential chemical-release risks from the under-construction Silfab factory in Fort Mill.

The study, commissioned by the local advocacy group Citizens Alliance for Government Integrity (CAGI) and released this week, modeled accidental releases of 5 hazardous chemicals (out of a total of 21 total hazardous chemicals Silfab would use, according to the report), including Anhydrous Ammonia, Silane, Hydrofluoric Acid, Hydrochloric Acid, and Nitrous Oxide.

The study concluded that hazardous plumes could travel miles and cause irreversible harm to dozens of nearby neighborhoods and schools.

“These findings show that the consequences are not minor and they are not hypothetical,” said Andy Lytle, president of CAGI. “When emergency-response modeling shows the potential for life-threatening or deadly exposure well beyond a facility’s boundaries, the only responsible conclusion is that this facility does not belong next to schools and neighborhoods.”

Silfab was unhappy with the findings, calling the modeling unrealistic. In response to the report, the company said:

“The most recent sponsored study promoted by CAGI still fails to include Silfab Solar’s actual processes, engineered systems, multiple approved risk mitigation systems and safety measures in its assessment of a worst-case scenario.”

The USC researchers stated that their analysis examined credible risk scenarios using chemical quantities provided by Silfab’s own filings, industry standard modeling, and ‘engineering experience’.

“Large quantities of hazardous chemicals pose an inherent risk to the surrounding populous and environment. Accidents, terrorism, or vandalism causing a chemical release at the Silfab Solar SC facility (Silfab), coupled with damage to (or complete failure of) the facility’s safety systems (scrubbers, sumps, high level alarms, etc.), can lead to catastrophic consequences. Further, accidents or terrorist attack during delivery of bulk chemicals on nearby roadways where safety systems are not in place can also lead to catastrophe,” the report noted. “This report is based largely on ALOHA runs, physical security expertise, and general engineering experience. ALOHA (5.4.7) was developed for emergency responders and planners by the Office of Emergency Management, EPA and the Emergency Response Division, NOAA.”

The dispute comes as community opposition to the project has been intensifying and the project’s zoning approvals and permitting appear to be on increasingly shaky ground.

In a recent legal filing, the York County BZA, a quasi-judicial branch of York County, stated that Silfab’s permits did not comply with the zoning code.

The filing specifically contradicts the county’s long-standing position that last year’s BZA ruling did not apply to the controversial Silfab factory, which is currently being built on a light industrial-zoned property in Fort Mill, South Carolina.

On May 9th, 2024, the York County Board of Zoning Appeals ruled that “Solar Panel
Manufacturing” is not permitted in York County’s “Light Industrial district”.

However, just one month later, York County issued an unsigned management statement (still on their website here) that stated that “The decision by the BZA on May 9th did not apply to Silfab”.

Soon after this statement was released, York County Planning and Zoning, under the authority of York County Manager Joshua Edwards, began issuing permits to Silfab to begin construction, including permits for their central energy plant, chemical storage buildings and bunkers, wastewater treatment plant, and chemical processing lines.

In the new filing (case #2024CP4602641), York County’s BZA attorneys correct the County’s long-standing position that the BZA “did not apply to Silfab”.

The York County BZA attorneys state, in part;

“…Buchanan’s request for a Zoning Code Interpretation sought to confirm whether
Silfab’s solar cell and panel manufacturing use complies with all applicable zoning provisions, including the table of uses governing the Light Industrial District where the Facility is located…” (pg 5/18)

“…As the Facility’s neighbor, Buchanan surely has an interest in confirming whether Appellants’ solar cell and panel manufacturing use complies with the Zoning Code. If it does not, as the BZA found, interested parties (including Buchanan and, of course, the County) can obtain a court order enjoining the disallowed use as well as other relief. S.C. Code Ann. § 6-29-950 (authorizing both local governments and an “adjacent or neighboring property owner” to sue to enjoin the unlawful use of property)…” (pg 10/18)

“…the record supports the BZA’s decision that solar cell and panel manufacturing is an unlisted, prohibited use of a heavy industrial nature…” (pg 11/18)

Now that the York County Board of Zoning Appeals clarified that their ruling last year did apply directly to Silfab, before their permits were issued, their permits seem to be legally void, according to York County Code § 155.1121, “No building permit shall be issued… until zoning compliance has been approved by the Zoning Administrator”, and according to SC Peterson v. Greenville County, 2011, “An invalid zoning permit issued in violation of applicable zoning laws confers no rights and is void ab initio”. 

The York County Council will now have to decide if they will attempt to re-zone Silfab’s property to heavy industrial or if they will revoke the permits that were issued to Silfab in violation of the zoning code.

Iredell County Man Arrested For Shooting Teens During ‘Ding-Dong Ditch’ Prank

0
via Iredell County Detention Center

A 59-year-old Iredell County man was just arrested for open firing on a group of teens who were playing “ding-dong-ditch” in his neighborhood.

According to the Iredell County Sheriff’s Office, deputies were conducting a traffic stop along Taylorsville Highway around 11:20 p.m. on Jan. 3 when they heard gunfire coming from a nearby neighborhood. Dispatchers then alerted them to a 911 call reporting a gunshot victim on Castle Pines Drive. When deputies arrived, they found an empty vehicle with its passenger door open, broken glass, and multiple bullet holes.

Five juveniles were located in a nearby field, one suffering a gunshot wound to the leg. First responders transported the injured minor to Wake Forest Baptist Hospital for treatment.

As investigators searched the area, deputies said 59-year-old Craig Steven Mason approached and admitted he fired the shots. According to the sheriff’s office, Mason told detectives he was awakened by loud noises outside his home, retrieved a handgun, and walked outside to investigate. He said he saw a vehicle driving through the neighborhood without headlights and fired four times as it passed.

Deputies later confirmed Mason did not live at any of the homes targeted in the “ding-dong ditch” prank and had not been approached by the juveniles before the shooting.

Mason was arrested on Jan. 5 and charged with felony assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious injury, four counts of felony assault with a deadly weapon, and felony discharging a weapon into an occupied vehicle causing serious bodily injury. A magistrate denied bond, and a district court judge will determine the bond at a later hearing.

The sheriff’s office said the investigation remains active as detectives continue interviewing witnesses and reviewing evidence.

Sheriff McFadden Faces Potential Removal as DA Requests Full SBI Probe

0

Mecklenburg County District Attorney Spencer Merriweather has just asked the State Bureau of Investigation to examine explosive allegations against Sheriff Garry McFadden, one day after a petition seeking the sheriff’s removal was filed in court.

The petition — submitted by state representative Carla Cunningham and four former sheriff’s office leaders — accuses McFadden of retaliation, misuse of resources, workplace abuse and threatening a legislator.

Under North Carolina law, removal petitions cannot proceed without approval from the district attorney or county attorney. Merriweather said his office typically reviews such claims only after a law enforcement investigation, prompting his formal request to the SBI. His letter outlines several potential criminal violations for investigators to examine, including extortion, bribery, campaign finance violations, and possible Hatch Act violations.

Cunningham’s filing alleges McFadden threatened her after she opposed legislation increasing cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Other claims describe “weaponizing” internal affairs and retaliating against whistleblowers and crime victims.

Merriweather emphasized that requesting an investigation does not confirm wrongdoing but said the allegations require independent review before any decision on advancing the petition. A judge will ultimately determine whether McFadden remains in office, setting up one of the most significant legal challenges to a Mecklenburg County official in years.

FIT Precast Picks Gastonia for New Headquarters and Massive $102 Million Facility

0

FIT Precast just announced plans to build a new $102 million headquarters and concrete pipe manufacturing facility in Gastonia, bringing 125 new jobs to the region.

The company will construct a 154,000-square-foot campus to support its administrative and production operations. FIT Precast will manufacture precast concrete and piping products used in stormwater systems, transportation projects, and utility construction across the Southeast.

“The demand for resilient, American-made infrastructure has never been greater, and North Carolina is the ideal place to meet that challenge,” said Matt Goreski, President of FIT Precast in a press release. “This flagship headquarters and production facility is the most advanced precast concrete manufacturing site in the country; investing in both leading-edge technology and the people of North Carolina with high paying, meaningful careers. The Gaston County EDC and the State of North Carolina consistently went above and beyond to secure this project, we would like to thank them for making this our new home.”

New jobs will average $102,168 a year—nearly double Gaston County’s average salary of $52,180. Officials estimate the project will generate more than $12.7 million in annual payroll.

The state approved a Job Development Investment Grant to support the project. Over 12 years, the investment is expected to add $530 million to North Carolina’s economy. The JDIG authorizes up to $2.3 million in potential reimbursement, issued only after the company meets hiring and investment targets.

With a projected 170% return on investment, state leaders say the deal will return $2.70 in revenue for every public dollar committed.

Why Purchasing a Property Beside The Ocean Is Good For Your Health In Thailand

0

If you are currently in the market for a new property, you have certainly come to the right place. There are many different locations to choose from all across Thailand, but some stand out better than others. When people are asked about where they would like to reside, many say that they would love to be able to own a property near the ocean. There is something about the sea that draws us to it, and if you get any chance to buy a property close to the ocean, you need to take advantage of this situation.

Many people believe that buying a property near the ocean is incredibly expensive, but they would be very wrong. There are a number of sea view condos for sale in Pattaya, which are incredibly affordable and are available to you right now. This is the perfect opportunity to provide not only yourself with better health outcomes, but also for your other family members. If you’re not yet convinced, the following are some of the reasons why purchasing a property beside the ocean is good for your overall health.

  • Enjoy the cleaner air – Thailand does experience quite a bit of pollution at a particular time of the year, around January to late March. The north of the country is blanketed in dirty air, and this contributes to a number of health issues. The fact that you will be buying a property beside the sea is one way to provide your family with much cleaner air. Not only will your lungs be healthier, but your serotonin levels will increase, and this leads to higher energy levels as well. The fact that the ocean is nearby will encourage you to exercise more and to go for walks along the seashore.
  • It’s great for your immune system – There have been many studies carried out on the fact that people who live near the ocean live longer. Many governments are always trying to encourage their citizens to enjoy more blue space, and this is exactly what you could be doing every single day of your life. If you are living near the water, you’re more likely to take advantage of the various water sports that are currently available, which allows you to get essential vitamin D from the sunshine.
  • You get a better night’s sleep – Sleep is so incredibly important when it comes to living our lives. Many complain that even after sleeping for eight hours a night, they are still exhausted and not ready for the day ahead. Once again, there have been studies that relate living near the sea to a better quality of sleep. The incidence of depression is also much lower, and living beside the ocean puts you in a better mood and makes you more positive.

Hopefully, these three reasons can encourage you to start looking into buying a property in the Pattaya area. Make positive changes to your living situation today.