Let’s talk about enterprise architecture consulting. This topic is quite extensive, but today we will look at why people so often have the wrong opinion about this direction in IT.
What is the problem of all companies, without exception? The business has its own understanding of what is happening, its own requirements and tasks, but it is very difficult to translate them into the language of specific IT actions, and these requirements do not always reach IT in an understandable form.
The second traditional problem is legacy IT. There have been a lot of chaotic purchases and implementations in the past years, which creates a lot of complexity in the IT landscape. Any IT manager who comes to the company takes a lot of time to understand the current situation. On the other hand, businesses invest money in IT and want to see where it goes, what projects and initiatives it takes, and how it moves the company toward strategic goals.
The direction of corporate architecture is not yet developed. Companies are in great demand for the development of architectures for specific solutions, but no one is seriously engaged in linking the components of the architecture within the organization. At best, spreadsheets are used for this purpose, where information is stored in an unformalized form, and when a manager leaves the company, knowledge goes with him.
The most important consequence of this approach is the suboptimal spending on IT, sometimes even their direct waste. That is why companies abroad are increasingly demonstrating a strategic approach to IT management, and the vector is increasingly leaning towards the streamlining and standardization of corporate IT landscapes.
Words into action
The issue is clear: business and IT must be linked transparently. The plan must be conveyed to the people as mandates and activities. Each department must comprehend the task and the overall IT development strategy.
Oracle Enterprise Maps is meant to fix this. Notably, this is a company-developed solution, rather than an acquired one. That’s good: HPE, as a system provider, saw a market need and developed a solution to meet it. Enterprise Maps is an in-house solution that effortlessly integrates and enhances data from other HPE systems.
Rather than reinventing the wheel, Enterprise Maps employs the TOGAF methodology, which architects understand. ArchiMate 2.0 notation is used to describe how architectural parts interact.
The designed system’s major goals are to eliminate IT risks and confusion, and to assure IT plan compliance. Converting “beautiful” words into deeds is crucial. Also, real administration of the “zoo” of current systems becomes difficult: many suppliers have their own procedures for licensing, product updates, and phasing out obsolete solutions.
Almost every corporation has software that charges for support even when it is not required or the system has been retired. Another scenario is when a corporation prepares to construct a new system, unaware that the current platform is obsolete.
For IT and business
Inquiring minds If the firm has a corporate architect, he will be the principal shareholder.
Usually, drawing applications like Microsoft Visio are used to describe the architecture. Enterprise Maps is not about sketching, but about establishing real-world models, and many regulations will be maintained throughout development. No item can be created apart from reality.
Architects are a target audience that knows the system’s benefits and capabilities. Sadly, they do not monitor budgets and choices are made higher.
Then there are CFOs and CIOs. They have duties. For example, a CFO may not fully comprehend IT, but it is critical that he grasp where investments are going and their strategic importance. He will learn about this from an actual slice of information, not a report altered by workers. Transparency in the IT department’s actions and decision-making is crucial to the CIO.
If you are interested in this direction or need DevOps outsourcing services, please contact us!